C
Camo
Guest
When was the last mass shooting here in Australia mate? People with guns are the problem, don't be so naive.
Are they finding other ways mate?
Or are they fucking shooting up schools with guns?
You're concentrating on taking the emphasis off guns killing people and pretending that they didn't shoot guns, they willed those people to death with bad intentions.
clearly you haven't seen how people drive here :rofl:Seems like it would be harder for a student to get the keys to a car to mow over kids at a bus stop than it is to take their parents weapon to school.
At the end of the day innocent children have been murdered whilst at school. And the only thing different in the us compared to any where else in the world where it doesn't happen is your gun laws. And that is black and white.
Are they finding other ways mate?
Or are they fucking shooting up schools with guns?
You're concentrating on taking the emphasis off guns killing people and pretending that they didn't shoot guns, they willed those people to death with bad intentions.
When was the last mass shooting here in Australia mate? People with guns are the problem, don't be so naive.
It's funny to me that most of the rationalisation for being pro gun is fear and a right to bare arms.
It all sounds like propaganda to me.
Out of curiosity, those of you who said guns were a hobby, why guns and not knife throwing, bomb building or the art of strangulation?
All similar in the common denominator right...?
Is it that guns have been glorified and turned into a symbol of freedom and power? Maybe it's subconsciously cool to shoot guns and shit.
Obviously its propaganda... Who ever wanted to do businesses, made the 'subjects' believe so hard that they have to have it for showing off their 'freedom'. From this thread too its very clear that they succeed with flying colors. Lol.
Otherwise how does a 300 million population get 270million legal firearms? One can compare this industry lobbyists to the joker from dark knight!
Sent from my Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Your blanket statistic statement doesn't reflect anything other than the Joker was far from the norm.
An estimated 20% of gun owners possess 65% of the nation's guns, according to a Harvard University survey published in 2007.
A separate review by the General Social Survey, part of the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, has tracked a slow decline in the portion of Americans who own guns, from 29% in 1980 to about 21% in 2010
So if only 20% of the 300 million population or 60 million people own guns in the US. Then take that the number (20%) of multi-gun owners who hold 65% of the guns would bring us down to about 12 million people or roughly 4% of the american population is the holders of the majority of guns. Take into account that many multi-gun owners are former military service personnel, former police officers, ranchers, rural home owners, etc.
Now take your country sweden with an estimated population of 9 million people. You have approximately 2 million registered firearms. This ranks you number 10 on the list of ranking guns/population list. On top of that they estimate approximately 4 million guns possessed in your country illegally.
The only interesting thing is that handguns are so few of your guns like 5%.
Make sure your backyard is clean before you start pointing at your neighbors boss.
You have completely mistaken my statements. I was pointing to the industry and their intentions.
But if as per your numbers what havoc should society be prepared to expect if atleast 10% of population gets access to guns? We are talking abt guns which spoiled kids are using to kill other small kids, and going for some years now. Doesnt it sound serious ? Do you think such a dangerous weapon should available to every one?
Dont blame those swedes, i am here only for work.
But your last statement Sir, will backfire for sure on all context.
Sent from my Nexus using Tapatalk 2
I think everyone has given their opinion.
I HAVE HAD ENOUGH.
I'm out of this one